![]() Both want to sell you more stuff, only the store is less picky about which particular stuff.Īll that said, I do think we’re in a different era now, and the tech world is very different from the breakfast cereal world. Part of the problem is that it’s not clear that it’s any better that a store knows what you’ve bought than that the manufacturer does. And of course, the stores often then turn around sell that data back to manufacturers in various ways. And manufacturers have long tried to learn more about their customers when they aren’t selling directly-witness those “warranty” cards that used to be the norm, and all the various contests that breakfast cereals used to run. Sure, many will give it up if it’s part of the price of admission or trade it for something (sometimes for very little), but they wouldn’t want it to be the norm any more than they’d want General Mills to get their info every time they bought Cheerios at a grocery store.įor the most part, I don’t think customers think twice about whether the store or the manufacturer knows that they’ve bought something. Hopefully Apple will come up with a solution that is begrudgingly agreeable to all parties before they’re forced by government regulation or the courts to do something that we all end up hating.īut that’s not what the customers want. I’ve had to make phone calls that take forever to cancel subscriptions and that is so much worse than a simple click.Īlso as a consumer of course I’d want to see Apple’s payment processing fee reduced as low as possible, to reduce the cost of apps and subscriptions.Īs for other improvements - allowing apps to point to how to create an account allow (for example) Amazon to sell Kindle books within the app using their own payment method, just as the Amazon app sells physical goods - absolutely yes. And of course nobody beats Apple’s method to unenroll from a subscription. (Of course those are examples of apps that would probably exist in the Apple App Store as well, but I just use them as hypothetical examples.) I could see some companies with extremely popular apps deciding to skip Apple’s review process and only distribute using their own or a third party store, or requiring sideloading. The iPhone and iPad have been a huge improvement for the vast majority of users for this. I don’t want to have to remember that the Nest app came from Google’s store, and the Alexa app came from Amazon’s store, and Netflix required users to download the app to install directly, and Fantastical and CardHop only from the Flexibits store. It is simply fantastic that if I set up a phone from scratch I have a single place to find and install all of my apps - go to the purchased apps list and just click the download and install button for each one. What worries me about alternative app stores and/or sideloading is that we would need to pay attention to which app used which store or installation method. I can’t speak as a developer, but as a consumer I’d prefer just a single App Store and no sideloading at all. I’d like to continue having both of those options, thank you. ![]() One of the reasons I like the Mac stuff is that it’s much more flexible. I own an iPhone, iPad, and Mac, and one of the reasons I like the iOS stuff so much is that it’s nicely locked down. In fact, it suggests just how much pent up demand there is to scam the billions of iOS users out there. But that’s flawed as well – people and organizations are almost always doing things out of multiple motivations, and it seems much more likely that Apple is motivated by both things.įinally, just because the App Store is highly imperfect at weeding out scammers and the like doesn’t mean that allowing side loading won’t make the situation massively worse. On the motivation front, the unspoken assumption behind the logic is always that there has to be one motivator for Apple to do this. Customers can decide which computing platform they want to buy. In fact, rather the opposite seems true: Apple offers you a relatively open platform (the Mac) and a much more closed platform (the iOS). Just because the Mac is more open than the iPhone doesn’t mean that Apple has to drop the iPhone down to the Mac’s level. Charizard v star rainbow price.I’m not sure I buy the logic that security should default to the lowest denominator.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |